Loading...
COVID19

COVID19 Massive PCR tests a bad idea?

Suppose that you are worried that you might have a rare disease. You decide to get tested, and suppose that the testing methods for this disease are correct 99 percent of the time (in other words, if you have the disease, it shows that you do with 99 percent probability, and if you don’t have the disease, it shows that you do not with 99 percent probability). Suppose this disease is actually quite rare, occurring randomly in the general population in only one of every 10,000 people.

If your test results come back positive, what are your chances that you actually have the disease?

Do you think it is approximately: (a) .99, (b) .90, (c) .10, or (d) .01?

Surprisingly, the answer is (d), less than 1 percent chance that you have the disease!

Presentation Suggestions:
After discussing the reasons for the surprising probability (below), you should see how changing the parameters affects the outcome. Would the result be so surprising if the disease were more common? How would the probability change if you allow the percentage of false positives and false negatives to be different?

The Math Behind the Fact:
This fact may be deduced using something called Bayes’ theorem, which helps us find the probability of event A given event B, written P(A|B), in terms of the probability of B given A, written P(B|A), and the probabilities of A and B: 
P(A|B)=P(A)P(B|A) / P(B)
In this case, event A is the event you have this disease, and event B is the event that you test positive. Thus P(B|not A) is the probability of a “false positive”: that you test positive even though you don’t have the disease.

Here, P(B|A)=.99, P(A)=.0001, and P(B) may be derived by conditioning on whether event A does or does not occur:P(B)=P(B|A)P(A)+P(B|not A)P(not A)or .99*.0001+.01*.9999. Thus the ratio you get from Bayes’ Theorem is less than 1 percent.

The basic reason we get such a surprising result is because the disease is so rare that the number of false positives greatly outnumbers the people who truly have the disease. This can be seen by thinking about what we can expect in 1 million cases. In those million, about 100 will have the disease, and about 99 of those cases will be correctly diagnosed as having it. Otherwise about 999,900 of the million will not have the disease, but of those cases about 9999 of those will be false positives (test results that are positive because of errors). So, if you test positive, then the likelihood that you actually have the disease is about 99/(99+9999), which gives the same fraction as above, approximately .0098 or less than 1 percent!

Note that you can increase this probability by lowering the false positive rate.

Also note that these calculations wouldn’t hold if the disease were not independently and identically distributed throughout the population (e.g., in the case of cancer due to familial tendency, environmental factor, asbestos exposure, etc.).

47 comments
  1. yeezys

    I must express my affection for your kindness supporting persons that have the need for help with your idea. Your real commitment to passing the solution all-around had become wonderfully powerful and has in most cases made workers just like me to attain their objectives. Your amazing informative guide means much a person like me and far more to my peers. Regards; from each one of us.

  2. yeezy

    I simply desired to thank you so much once again. I do not know the things that I would’ve followed in the absence of the entire creative concepts shown by you directly on such question. It was an absolute traumatic scenario for me, however , witnessing the very skilled style you resolved that made me to cry with delight. Extremely happy for this guidance and thus believe you realize what an amazing job that you’re putting in teaching people via a web site. Probably you’ve never come across all of us.

  3. bape

    I wanted to type a brief word to be able to thank you for all of the lovely suggestions you are writing on this site. My time intensive internet investigation has at the end been compensated with extremely good details to talk about with my contacts. I would mention that many of us visitors actually are truly endowed to live in a decent place with very many brilliant individuals with helpful methods. I feel quite blessed to have come across the webpage and look forward to many more fun minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for all the details.

  4. golden goose

    I precisely wanted to thank you so much once again. I am not sure what I would have followed without those ways contributed by you concerning such problem. It has been an absolute troublesome crisis in my view, however , viewing this skilled tactic you solved the issue took me to leap over contentment. I am grateful for this work and sincerely hope you recognize what an amazing job that you’re accomplishing training men and women using your blog. I’m certain you haven’t met all of us.

  5. kyrie irving shoes

    I wish to express my passion for your generosity giving support to all those that actually need help on this one question. Your personal dedication to getting the solution throughout turned out to be wonderfully practical and have usually allowed guys just like me to arrive at their aims. This important useful information signifies a whole lot a person like me and extremely more to my office colleagues. Thanks a lot; from everyone of us.

  6. Marvella Abasta

    Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog
    before but after reading through some of the post
    I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and
    checking back frequently!

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *